Do organic farms cause unintended harm? The study found that there has been an increase in the use of pesticides in neighboring fields

Champions of organic farming have long demonstrated that it is friendlier to humans and the earth. But a new study in a California county found a surprising effect as their acreage grew: conventional farms nearby applied more pesticides, which likely kept their crops under increased insect threat, the researchers said.

Ashley Larsen, lead author of the study in this week’s Science magazine, said understanding what’s happening could be important in keeping organic and conventional farmers from harming each other’s operations.

“We are expecting an increase in the organism in the future. How do we make sure this isn’t causing unintended harm?” asked Larsen, an associate professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

In contrast, the researchers found that when organic farms surrounded by other organic areas, their pesticide use dropped, which the team thinks may be due in part to their reliance on bugs that are natural enemies of agricultural pests.

Certain organic farms are allowed to use approved pesticides, but often turn first to ‘good bugs’ that prey on the pests. “It seems that spatial clustering or focusing on organic areas could lead to that benefit or solution,” Larsen said.

Should organic and conventional farms be kept separate?

The researchers analyzed 14,000 fields in California’s Kern County over a seven-year period.

Organic farm acreage has been increasing since 2000, although it still accounts for less than 1 percent of all U.S. farmland, according to the USDA. As that change occurs, Larsen and her team say it could benefit both organic and conventional farms to be sufficiently separated.

But many farmers, both conventional and organic, are grappling with the idea of ​​policies that could restrict where different methods can be used. And some outside researchers said more studies were needed before policy recommendations could be considered.

They noted that the study did not measure the type or number of insects on the different farms, which means the increase pesticide perhaps just a precaution was being used.

Katy Rogers, farm manager at Teter Organic Farm and Retreat Center, stands inside the greenhouse at the facility, March 21, 2024, in Noblesville, Indiana.

Katy Rogers, farm manager at Teter Organic Farm and Retreat Center, stands inside the greenhouse at the facility, March 21, 2024, in Noblesville, Indiana. – AP Photo/Darron Cummings

Conventional farmers treat organic farms as ‘hot spots’ for pests

However, the “great data set” makes the study useful for generating meaningful questions about it farming practices and pesticides, said Christian Krupke, who studies insects as a professor of entomology at Purdue University and was not involved in the study. The overall number of insects going down, a phenomenon called the “insect apocalypse” some scientists, but the use of pesticides is not decreasing, he said.

Krupke said the research shows how traditional farmers live nearby organic operations “as a focal point of potential outbreaks”.

David Haviland, an entomologist at the University of California who was also not involved in the study, agreed. He described the fight in Kern County to control the glassy-winged weevil, which infests citrus orchards and can introduce devastating plant diseases to grapes, almonds and some other crops.

Haviland said that regional maps clearly show organic farms as “these big, incredible spots where there are large numbers of these pests.” Traditional growers next door have to increase their use of pesticides as a result, he said.

Yichao Rui, an agroecologist at Purdue, said that kind of response from farmers isn’t always due to an actual increase in pests; sometimes, it’s just “peace of mind”. And Katy Rogers, who manages an organic farm outside of Indianapolis, said it’s a misconception in many cases that organic farmers are harboring massive pest infestations.

“We’re not sustaining populations of harmful insects on most organic farms, on a well-managed farm,” she said. “We’re just fighting them with other tools first. Because of the evil bugs it would still destroy my crop.”

Rogers said in many cases it is a misconception that organic farmers are sustaining massive pest infestations.Rogers said in many cases it is a misconception that organic farmers are sustaining massive pest infestations.

Rogers said in many cases it is a misconception that organic farmers are sustaining massive pest infestations. – AP Photo/Darron Cummings

A ‘holistic assessment’ of farming practices is needed

Rui said investigating the environmental consequences of organic farming, both organic and conventional, is a worthwhile goal. farms room for improvement. But he thinks looking at pesticide use alone doesn’t take into account factors such as human health, air and water quality and ecosystem diversity that can be affected by different farming methods.

“We need to have a holistic assessment of the benefits and trade-offs of all these agricultural practices,” he said.

Brad Wheatley, Indiana a farmer who normally farms corn, said he hasn’t noticed any change in his pest control situation since his neighbor switched to organic four years ago.

He thinks so farmers it might be faster to apply more pesticides to high-value crops like the fruits, vegetables and nuts in California, but not as much per acre as the row crops he grows like corn and beans, and so it would take a larger change in the acre. the number of insects he saw on his farm before he got around to spraying more.

Wetli was more concerned with soil management. He is careful to plant cover crops and has worked to reduce tillage, which can lead to soil erosion and contamination of waterways, which he said can reduce organic matter. farming sometimes plowing is still involved.

A sign welcomes guests to the Teter Organic Farm and Retreat Center, March 2024, in Noblesville, Indiana.A sign welcomes guests to the Teter Organic Farm and Retreat Center, March 2024, in Noblesville, Indiana.

A sign welcomes guests to the Teter Organic Farm and Retreat Center, March 2024, in Noblesville, Indiana. – AP Photo/Darron Cummings

How does conventional farming affect an organism?

Meanwhile, organic farmers expressed concern that the study addresses the impact of organic farms on conventional farms but not the other way around. For example, they can lose their certification for up to three years if a banned substance is applied to their fields, even if by accident, according to the USDA.

Walter Goldstein, a corn breeder in Wisconsin who produces both organic and inorganic seeds, grew up working on an organic farm among conventional farms and still remembers the flow of pesticides.

“It’s just these really weird smells,” he said. “Chemical smell. they smell like factory stuff.”

Jay Shipman, who owns an organic farm in Kern County next to another large organic farm, said he likes farming next to someone with similar practices “not just because it’s economics”, he said, but because “this is how I eat. This is how I want my family to eat”.

However, he said he grew up in conventional agriculture and understands that convincing farmers to do something else can be “hard to change, hard to swallow”.

Rogers, manager of an Indianapolis organic farm, has spent much of her life in ordinary speech agriculture and says she was taught that organic farmers are “the enemy”. She is now very dedicated to a small church-run organic and regenerative farm with vegetables, beehives and hay.

Rogers said she can see benefits from clustering organic farms together, but thinks it could be “even greater to divide organic and conventional farmers as the researchers suggested.”

“At the deepest level, we all are steward’s land and we all want to contribute,” she said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *