The First Supper (2021-23), Tavares Strachan’s lifetime recreation of Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper in the courtyard of the Royal Academy, all parts played by heroes of Black history. Photo: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian
The open room flows: a circle of magnificent 18th-century portraits hangs in a spotlight in a dark rotunda. Ignatius Sancho, actor, writer, composer, the first man of African descent to vote in Britain, the speech that is still fast on his lips, is sitting for Thomas Gainsborough in Bath. A young man, half-smiling, but with care on his brow, posing for John Singleton Copley in London. Francis Barber, Samuel Johnson’s distinguished servant and companion, holds his beautiful head high in Joshua Reynolds’ studio in Leicester Square. Barber will succeed Dr. Johnson.
Every sitter in every major painting is black (including Kerry James Marshall’s contemporary depiction of Scipio Moorhead, an enslaved African American artist whose life and work are known only through the praise of a 1773 poem). Full gallery of Black subjects: this has never happened at the Royal Academy before. It’s a great start to the most dramatic, dramatic and radical demonstration to push the UK out of its 256-year history.
The obvious aim of this show, according to the curators, is to explore how deeply the effects of colonialism went beyond the UK and its past, while at the same time putting the experiences of Black and Brown people in the hundreds present year. So Gainsborough’s portrait hangs next to one of Sancho’s own sarcastic letters: “I am Sir the African – with two ffs – if you please.” And Turner’s pictures of turbulent oceans, in which so many people would be lost on terrible transatlantic slave voyages, are alongside Ellen Gallagher’s seemingly abstract paintings, in which small details such as drowned limbs and faces are created.
On the opposite wall, Frank Bowling is huge Medium extract from 1970 he tells the story again in red blood and burning gold, the tragic theme recreated in the faint outline of Africa and America held in the field of that immense force of paint.
The historical art is chosen wisely with shock. Johann Zoffany’s 1769 portrait of the Young family in frivolous fancy dress, Sir William – governor of Dominica, the slave – playing a cello in the centre, places an enslaved Black boy next to the blonder and younger slave Young brightness , which looks up angelically for outrageous contrast. Copley’s portrait of Mary and Elizabeth Royall, daughters of slaves in Antigua, gives only the faintest hint of their background in the Antiguan hump apparently landing on Mary’s small white hand.
The story continues
And before anyone begins to imagine that Reynolds, the first president of the UK, was an unqualified despot, look at his large portrait of the future George IV in silver satin and blue velvet suffering his clothes to be closely adjusted by Black servant whose face, of. of course, we can not see.
In Reynolds’ portrait, George IV is seen having his clothes closely adjusted by a Black servant whose face, of course, cannot be seen
A mahogany paint box of the type used by both Reynolds and Turner appears much later in the show, housed in a period glass case. In fact, it’s an extremely mordant model by Keith Piper, a founding member of the pioneering BLK Art Group of the 1980s, each and every pigment pan classified – as if by a British superintendent – in gradations of dark to light skin tone.
Each gallery has a different atmosphere and theme, choreographed for constant syncopation. A room of quiet beautiful prints and watercolors goes from India to Tahiti through changing time schemes. Other depictions of the 18th century Caribbean as a perfect paradise of peace and strength, all social and racial equality, are Karen McLean’s 2010 epigrammatic installation titled Primary Courses: Huts . Transferred photographic projections of large houses in Trinidad flutter over sacks of wood no more than the scraps of plywood from which they are made. Wealth overcomes poverty; grandeur slithers over humble scale.
The film Isaac Julien Lessons of the Hour plays in a gallery lined with velvet drapes. American abolitionist and runaway slave Frederick Douglass, played by Ray Fearon, delivers his visionary lecture to a white Victorian audience over in Edinburgh. On a piano in that film you see a small version of a Hiram Powers sculpture The Greek Slave , nubile nude that was insanely famous throughout America in the 19th century. In one version, Powers changed the chains for manacles, to refer to the growing anti-slavery movement. But there are many variations to be seen in Employees Pasts, so you can see the different stages of his promotion.
This is creative, absorbing and incredibly clever: ideas embodied through the art itself rather than through the monotonous wall texts that guide us through similar shows. Because other such institutional self-questionings have occurred recently, including last year’s re-treatment of Tate Britain in light of its origins in colonial slavery.
Nothing in that rearrangement, however, is quite as devastating as the triangulation of three works in the gallery here that focus on brightness . This subject goes in many directions, from images of cotton fields where enslaved people sometimes worked from the age of six, like Frederick Douglass, to paintings like the work of William Mulready. The Toy Seller (1863), where a Black man gives a weary side-eye to a small, bright-eyed child who is too afraid to look at him from Mama’s arms.
You immediately see with new eyes the wide expanse of white cotton stretching all the way down the table of post-painting capsules in Frederick William Elwell’s portrait of the selection and hanging committee of the Royal Academy in 1938. And at the terrible painting of two girls with white skin, a red head who struggled to cover their nakedness with white clothes against the eyes of love in 1892 by Frank Dicksee. Tin . Dicksee, future UK president, lectured his students: “Our beauty must be the white man’s ideal.”
Directly opposite hung a blank blank sheet, pegged to a line. A black steam iron is attached to an ironing board below – its shape suddenly echoing, in memory, those terrible illustrations of slave ships. This installation, made by the amazing non-genuine artist Betye Saar, born in California in 1926, is so concise that you hardly notice the KKK monogram embroidered on the sheet.
Lubaina Himid’s life-long clips of the enslaved Africans forced to work as dog trainers, dancers, toy makers and potters, for example, when they were shipped over to Bristol in the 18th century, are given two whole galleries for their joyous presence and poignant to spread. tragic labels on their backs fully visible). They speak directly to others throughout this exhibition, but also to Tavares Strachan’s lifelong pursuits The Last Supper in black and gold in the UK yard outside, all the parts played by heroes of Black history.
A key to these figures is provided; and it is still necessary, unfortunately. Which goes to an almost imperceptibly raised question at the beginning of the show. For Dorothy Price and her exceptional team of female curators, Marshall’s imaginary portrait of Scipio Moorhead is included for more than just its quality. Who among us has heard of this disappeared painter? Who can say for sure that this is real yes Francis Barber in the portrait of Joshua Reynolds? And why do we have no real idea who John Singleton Copley is painting? Pay attention through this show and art will challenge history: who ignored the humanity, and identity, of all these long lost people?
• Employed Travel: Art, Colonialism and Change is at the Royal Academy, London, until 28 April